Is Normative Uncertainty Irrelevant If Your Descriptive Uncertainty Depends on It?


Authors
Pamela Robinson
Australian National University
Abstract
According to ‘Excluders’, descriptive uncertainty—but not normative uncertainty—matters to what we ought to do. Recently, several authors have argued that those wishing to treat normative uncertainty differently from descriptive uncertainty face a dependence problem because one’s descriptive uncertainty can depend on one’s normative uncertainty. The aim of this paper is to determine whether the phenomenon of dependence poses a decisive problem for Excluders. I argue that existing arguments fail to show this, and that, while stronger ones can be found, Excluders can escape them.
Keywords moral uncertainty  normative uncertainty  descriptive uncertainty
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-06

Total views
158 ( #66,121 of 2,445,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
158 ( #3,619 of 2,445,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes