Some Observations on “Observational” Research

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (2):252-263 (2009)
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) ranks different medical research methods on a hierarchy, at the top of which are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews or meta-analyses of RCTs. Any study that does not randomly assign patients to a treatment or a control group is automatically placed at a lower level on the hierarchy. This article argues that what matters is whether the treatment and control groups are similar with respect to potential confounding factors, not whether they got that way through randomization. Moreover, nonrandomized studies tend to have other characteristics that make them useful sources of evidence, in that they tend to last longer and to enroll more patients than do randomized trials. Replacing the sharp dichotomy between randomized and nonrandomized studies with a continuum from "clean" studies (which have high internal validity but whose results do not readily generalize to clinical practice) to pragmatic studies (which are designed to more closely reflect clinical practice) would also make a place for outcomes research and research using clinical databases, which are not included in the current hierarchy of evidence but which can provide important information about the safety and efficacy of treatments.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pbm.0.0076
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,786
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perspectives on Clinical Possibility: Elements of Analysis.Daniele Chiffi & Renzo Zanotti - 2016 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22 (4):509-514.
Hollow Hunt for Harms.Jacob Stegenga - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (5):481-504.
Perspectives on Clinical Possibility: Elements of Analysis.Daniele Chiffi & Renzo Zanotti - 2015 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice:DOI: 10.1111/jep.12447.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Evidence-Based Medicine Must Be ..A. la Caze - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (5):509-527.
Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Placebo Effect and Randomized Clinical Trials.Gunnel Elander & Göran Hermerén - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (2).
Clinical Equipoise and the Incoherence of Research Ethics.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):151 – 165.
The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine.Jeremy Howick - 2011 - Wiley-Blackwell, Bmj Books.
Semmelweis's Methodology From the Modern Stand-Point: Intervention Studies and Causal Ontology.Johannes Persson - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 40 (3):204-209.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
35 ( #167,153 of 2,231,512 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,507 of 2,231,512 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature