Animus 3:211-226 (1998)

Neil Robertson
University of King's College
This paper argues that underlying Leo Strauss's interpretation of Early Modern political thought as premised on a break with nature as a moral standard is a contemporary moral and political phenomenology which inhibits the understanding of that period in its own terms
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy and Politics, II.Victor Gourevitch - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (2):281 - 328.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leo Strauss: The Early Writings (1921-1932).Leo Strauss - 2002 - State University of New York Press.
Illuminating the Radical Democratic Enlightenment. [REVIEW]Ericka Tucker - 2012 - Studies in Social and Political Thought 20:138-141.
The Emergence of the Early Modern Concept of System.Richard A. Talaska - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11 (9999):1-86.
Disguised Vices: Theories of Virtue in Early Modern French Thought.Sean Greenberg - 2013 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (1):123-124.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #622,534 of 2,463,128 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,463,128 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes