Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):377-392 (2016)

Authors
Janie Brisson
Université du Québec à Montreal
Serge Robert
Université du Québec à Montreal
Abstract
During the last decades, the psychology of reasoning has identified experimentally many fallacies committed by spontaneous reasoners. Given these experimental results, some theories have been developed about this phenomenon, mainly algorithmic theories. This paper develops instead a computational modelling of these current fallacies which appear as simplifications in the treatment of information that do not respect the formal rules of classical propositional logic. These fallacies are explained as crushes in the Klein group structure and so, in squares of opposition. These crushes are an effect of not to take into account the dual of the binary operator at work in the major premise of the inference. This analysis allows predictions on fallacies not identified before, which are fallacies produced when reasoning with incompatibilities. The paper concludes with consequences of the analysis on pedagogical strategies for the teaching of logic.
Keywords Human reasoning  fallacies  Klein group  mental models  computational modelling  group crush  predictions on fallacies  reasoning with incompatibilities  squares of opposition  teaching of logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11787-016-0150-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,467
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Vatican Square.Jean-Yves Beziau & Raffaela Giovagnoli - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):135-141.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy.Kevin Korb - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):41-70.
Fallacies.Robert J. Fogelin & Timothy J. Duggan - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):255-262.
Fallacies and Argument Appraisal.Christopher W. Tindale - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
The Coherence of Hamblin's Fallacies.Ralph Johnson - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):305-317.
Fallacious Reasoning.Laurence Goldstein - 1995 - Teaching Philosophy 18 (2):139-146.
The Vices of Argument.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):413-422.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-11

Total views
19 ( #542,805 of 2,421,213 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,757 of 2,421,213 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes