Christian Bioethics 13 (2):199-209 (2007)
It seems intuitive to the believer that God intended through instruction in the Law to define morality, intended to lead humankind to “the right and the good.” Further, God's love for humankind, exemplified by the incarnation, atonement and teachings of Jesus, and empowered by the Holy Spirit, should lead to a better world. Indeed, the Christian worldview is a coherent and valid way to look at bioethical issues in public policy and at the bedside. Yet, as this paper explores, in a pluralistic society such as the United States, it is neither possible nor desirable for Christians to try to force their views on others. Still, it is obligatory for Christians to stand up and articulate their views in the public square. We should try to persuade others using either prudential or moral arguments. While we must be willing to live with “the will of the people,” at the same time, we must not be intimidated into accepting the position that our voice is not valid because it has a religious basis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Philosophy, Social Institutions, and the Ethics of Belief: A Response to Buchanan.Alan Carter - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):299-306.
Beyond Serving a Purpose: Additional Ethical Focuses for Public Policy Agents.Vanessa Scholes - 2011 - In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David Eng (eds.), Ethics and public policy: contemporary issues. Victoria University Press.
Public Philosophy: Distinction Without Authority.Paul T. Menzel - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (4):411-424.
Moral Difficulties in Plantinga's Model of Warranted Christian Belief.Michael W. Austin - 2005 - Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):121-132.
Towards More Confidence: About the Roles of Social Scientists in Participatory Policy Making.Corinna Jung - 2009 - Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):125-129.
Chimeras, Moral Status, and Public Policy: Implications of the Abortion Debate for Public Policy on Human/Nonhuman Chimera Research.Robert Streiffer - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):238-250.
Ethics and Public Policy Analysis: Stakeholders' Interests and Regulatory Policy. [REVIEW]L. Katharine Harrington - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (4):373 - 382.
Public Consultation in Bioethics. What's the Point of Asking the Public When They Have Neither Scientific nor Ethical Expertise?Mairi Levitt - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (1):15-25.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads20 ( #235,712 of 2,051,011 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #92,613 of 2,051,011 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.