Undermining undermined: Why Humean supervenience never needed to be debugged (even if it's a necessary truth)

Abstract
The existence of "undermining futures" appears to show that a contradiction can be deduced from the conjunction of Humean supervenience (HS) about chance and the Principal Principle. A number of strategies for rescuing HS from this problem have been proposed recently. In this paper, a novel way of defending HS from the threat is presented, and it is argued that this defense has advantages not shared by others. In particular, it requires no revisionism about chance, and it is equally available to defenders of HS who hold HS to be necessary and those who hold it to be contingent
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/392901
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Anatomy of the Big Bad Bug.Rachael Briggs - 2009 - Noûs 43 (3):428-449.
Foundations of Probability.Rachael Briggs - forthcoming - Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-16.
Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: The Old Principal Principle Reconciled with the New.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):368–382.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
72 ( #77,359 of 2,210,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #356,853 of 2,210,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature