Draft version of essay. ABSTRACT: Benjamin Whichcote developed a distinctive account of human nature centered on our moral psychology. He believed that this view of human nature, which forms the foundation of “Cambridge Platonism,” showed that the demands of reason and faith are not merely compatible but dynamically supportive of one another. I develop an interpretation of this oft-neglected and widely misunderstood account of human nature and defend its viability against a key objection.
|Keywords||Cambridge Platonism moral psychology Human Nature Ralph Cudworth Henry More John Smith modal voluntarism divine command Image of God Neoplatonism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Unshredded Scotus.Allan B. Wolter - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):315-356.
Human Nature and Conduct, An Introduction to Social Psychology.John Dewey - 1922 - Henry Holt.
Divine Command Theories and Human Analogies.John L. Hammond - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):216 - 223.
The Religious Rationalism of Benjamin Whichcote.Michael B. Gill - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (2):271-300.
From Cambridge Platonism to Scottish Sentimentalism.Michael B. Gill - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (1):13-31.
Added to index2010-04-05
Total downloads243 ( #14,233 of 2,158,669 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #13,496 of 2,158,669 )
How can I increase my downloads?