Abstract
This paper traces the reception of Babylonian astronomy into the history of science, beginning in early to mid twentieth century when cuneiform astronomical sources became available to the scholarly public. The dominant positivism in philosophy of science of this time influenced criteria employed in defining and demarcating science by historians, resulting in a persistently negative assessment of the nature of knowledge evidenced in cuneiform sources. Ancient Near Eastern astronomy was deemed pre- or non-scientific, and even taken to reflect a stage in the evolution of thought before the emergence of science. Two principal objections are examined: first, that the Near East produced merely practical as opposed to theoretical knowledge and, second, that astronomy was in the service of astrology and religion. As the notion of a universal scientific method has been dismantled by post-positivists and constructivists of the second half of the twentieth century, an interest in varieties of intellectual and cultural contexts for science has provided a new ground for the re-consideration of Babylonian astronomical texts as science developed here.Author Keywords: Babylonian astronomy; Cuneiform texts; Epistemology; Hellenistic astronomy; Religion and science; Theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00022-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Strengths and Weaknesses of the History of Mentalities.Peter Burke - 1986 - History of European Ideas 7 (5):439-451.
Philosophy of Science and the Persistent Narratives of Modernity.Joseph Rouse - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (1):141-162.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Otto Neugebauer, Historian.Roshdi Rashed & Lewis Pyenson - 2012 - History of Science 50 (4):402-431.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Celestial Measurement in Babylonian Astronomy.J. M. Steele - 2007 - Annals of Science 64 (3):293-325.
Ṯābit B. Qurra and Arab Astronomy in the 9th Century.Régis Morelon - 1994 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4 (1):111.
Al-Fārābī on the Method of Astronomy.Damien Janos - 2010 - Early Science and Medicine 15 (3):237-265.
Greek Astronomy and its Debt to the Babylonians.Leonard W. Clarke - 1962 - British Journal for the History of Science 1 (1):65-77.
Astrophysics and Twentieth-Century Astronomy to 1950, the General History of Astronomy.Owen Gingerich - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):510-513.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
22 ( #467,835 of 2,403,328 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,892 of 2,403,328 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes