Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (1):185-193 (2011)

Authors
William Roche
Texas Christian University
Abstract
If a subject’s belief system is inconsistent, does it follow that the subject’s beliefs (all of them) are unjustified? It seems not. But, coherentist theories of justification (at least some of them) imply otherwise, and so, it seems, are open to counterexample. This is the “Problem of Justified Inconsistent Beliefs”.  I examine two main versions of the Problem of Justified Inconsistent Beliefs, and argue that coherentists can give at least a promising line of response to each of them.
Keywords Coherentism  Inconsistency  Justification  Problem of Justified Inconsistenct Beliefs
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
ISBN(s) 0897-2346
DOI 10.5840/swphilreview201127120
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

``Justified Inconsistent Beliefs".Richard Foley - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4):247-257.
Coherentism and Justified Inconsistent Beliefs: A Solution.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):21-41.
Coherence and the Modularity of Mind.Erik J. Olsson - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):404-11.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-01

Total views
183 ( #64,032 of 2,506,155 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #73,777 of 2,506,155 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes