Authors
Stefanie Rocknak
Hartwick College
Abstract
Is there a distinction between “art” and “craft,” where the former is motivated by something like “genuine” or “authentic” creativity and the latter by, at best, skill and skill alone, and at a worst, a fumbling attempt to fit in with popular modes of expression? In this paper, I suggest that there does seem to be such a distinction. In particular, I attempt to show that genuine creativity, and so, genuine art—in varying respects—is motivated by a certain recognition of what we might understand as the most universal, and perhaps the most important property of all human beings: the brutal fact that our lives are limited; in the end, we all die. To show why I think this is the case, I have divided my paper into three parts. In the first, I briefly explain why we might view mortality as our most pressing issue and concomitantly, why we might understand it to be the driving force behind not only our desire to procreate, but also, to create. In the second part of the paper, I do something that is not strictly “philosophical”—I canvas a number of remarks by poets and writers who, like myself, are convinced that death is our primary muse, but not necessarily in a morbid, or despairing respect—in fact, we see that this is quite the opposite in some cases (c.f. Nabokov, 1966). Why do I do this? Because it seems obvious to me that we should ask the actual artists about what motivates them, rather than putting words into their mouths. In the third and final part of the paper, I offer a brief philosophical explanation of why and how—in light of sections one and two—we might begin to distinguish between genuine art and craft.
Keywords death  art  craft  aesthetics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Calling.[author unknown] - 2007 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:197-247.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

James Warren, Facing Death. Epicurus and His Critics. [REVIEW]Voula Tsouna - 2007 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 1:195-202.
Facing Death: Theme and Variations.David F. Martin - 2006 - Bucknell University Press.
Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics. [REVIEW]Douglas W. Portmore - 2005 - Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (3-4):521-526.
Why is Chu Kuang-Ch'ien's Aesthetic Thought Subjective Idealism?I. Ts'ai - 1975 - Chinese Studies in Philosophy 6 (3):62.
Why is Chu Kuang-Ch'ien's Aesthetic Thought Subjective Idealism?Ts'ai I. - 1975 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 6 (3):62-118.
The Ethics of Withholding and Withdrawing Critical Care.Lee M. Sanders & Thomas A. Raffin - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (2):175.
What Do I Fear in Facing My Death?Alan Paskow - 1975 - Man and World 8 (2):146-156.
Facing Death.William J. Winslade - 1994 - Teaching Philosophy 17 (2):182-185.
The Death of Chiron: Ovid, Fasti 5.379–414.Ian Brookes - 1994 - Classical Quarterly 44 (02):444-.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-01-14

Total views
88 ( #123,791 of 2,454,961 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #117,502 of 2,454,961 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes