Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):591-593 (2013)
Background Payment of research participants helps to increase recruitment for research studies, but can pose ethical dilemmas. Research ethics committees (RECs) have a centrally important role in guiding this practice, but standardisation of the ethical approval process in Ireland is lacking. Aim Our aim was to examine REC policies, experiences and concerns with respect to the payment of participants in research projects in Ireland. Method Postal survey of all RECs in Ireland. Results Response rate was 62.5% (n=50). 80% of RECs reported not to have any established policy on the payment of research subjects while 20% had refused ethics approval to studies because the investigators proposed to pay research participants. The most commonly cited concerns were the potential for inducement and undermining of voluntary consent. Conclusions There is considerable variability among RECs on the payment of research participants and a lack of clear consensus guidelines on the subject. The development of standardised guidelines on the payment of research subjects may enhance recruitment of research participants
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Payment for Research Participation: A Coercive Offer?A. Wertheimer & F. G. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):389-392.
The Influence of Risk and Monetary Payment on the Research Participation Decision Making Process.J. P. Bentley - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):293-298.
Ending Concerns About Undue Inducement.Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32 (1):100-105.
Ethics in Human Subjects Research: Do Incentives Matter?Ruth W. Grant & Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):717 – 738.
Paying People to Participate in Research: Why Not?Paul McNeill - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (5):390-396.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tis but a Scratch: The Human Tissue Act and the Use of Tissue for Research, Issues for Research Ethics Committees.David Hunter - unknown
Misconceptions About Coercion and Undue Influence: Reflections on the Views of Irb Members.Emily Largent, Christine Grady, Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (9):500-507.
Informing Research Participants of Research Results: Analysis of Canadian University Based Research Ethics Board Policies.S. D. MacNeil - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (1):49-54.
Children in Medical Research: Access Versus Protection.Ross Lainie Friedman - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
New Governance Arrangements for Research Ethics Committees: Is Facilitating Research Achieved at the Cost of Participants' Interest.E. Cave - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):318-321.
Getting Beyond Form Filling: The Role of Institutional Governance in Human Research Ethics. [REVIEW]Gary Allen - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation.Paul M. McNeill - 1993 - Cambridge University Press.
Polish Research Ethics Committees in the European Union System of Assessing Medical Experiments.Marek Czarkowski & Krzysztof Różanowski - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):201-212.
Animal Research Ethics in Africa: Is Tanzania Making Progress?Misago Seth & Fredy Saguti - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):158-162.
Regulating Human Participants Protection in Medical Research and the Accreditation of Medical Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands.Marcel J. H. Kenter - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):33-43.
Juggling Through Hoops: Implementing Ethics Policies in Applied Language Studies. [REVIEW]Janna Fox, Natasha Artemeva, Richard Darville & Devon Woods - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):77-99.
Added to index2012-12-02
Total downloads5 ( #590,804 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?