Rohrbaugh and deRosset on the Necessity of Origin

Mind 115 (458):361-366 (2006)
Abstract
In ‘A New Route to the Necessity of Origin’, Rohbraugh and deRosset offer an argument for the Necessity of Origin appealing neither to Suffciency of Origin nor to a branching-times model of necessity. What is doing the crucial work in their argument is instead the thesis they name ‘Locality of Prevention’. In this response, we object that their argument is question-begging by showing, first, that the locality of prevention thesis is not strong enough to satisfactorily derive from it the intended conclusion, and, second, that the argument is not sound unless the Necessity of Origin is operating as an implicit premiss.
Keywords Essentialism  Necessity of Origins
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzl361
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,719
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Essential Properties and Individual Essences.Sonia Roca-Royes - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (1):65-77.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
79 ( #68,908 of 2,197,307 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #44,170 of 2,197,307 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature