Stefanie Rocknak
Hartwick College
Here we will see that contrary to the party line, Hume’s notion of a relation should be understood, in all cases, as a peculiar non-necessary synthetic relation; unique, but similar in a certain constructive sense to what I characterize as a mathematical notion of synthesis. And, most controversially, I argue that this non-necessary synthetic notion of a relation includes Hume’s arithmetical relations, which have typically been interpreted as either “analytic,” necessary, or both. In this general respect, Hume anticipates Quine’s attack on the analytic/synthetic distinction.
Keywords David Hume  Modern Philosophy  W.V.O Quine  analytic v. synthetic  analytic  synthetic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hume, David: Religion.C. Lorkowski - 2013 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hume and Hume's Connexions.M. A. Stewart & John P. Wright (eds.) - 1995 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Understanding Hume.John J. Jenkins - 1992 - Barnes & Noble.
Contrariety and Causality in Hume.Benjamin Cohen - 1978 - Hume Studies 4 (1):29-39.
David Hume on Monetary Policy: A Retrospective Approach.Maria Pia Paganelli - 2009 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (1):65-85.


Added to PP index

Total views
33 ( #292,958 of 2,333,391 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #98,977 of 2,333,391 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes