A logical-pragmatic perspective on validity

Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 2 (2):40-44 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Background: Despite being often taken as the benchmark of quality for diagnostic and classificatory tools, 'validity' is admitted as a poorly worked out notion in psychiatric nosology. Objective: Here we aim at presenting a view that we believe to do better justice to the significance of the notion of validity, as well as at explaining away some misconceptions and inappropriate expectations regarding this attribute in the aforementioned context. Method: The notion of validity is addressed taking into account its role, the framework according to which it should be assessed and the specific contents to which it refers within psychiatric nosology. Results and Conclusions: The notion of validity has an epistemological thrust and its foremost role is distinguishing correct reasoning and truth from what is irrational or false. From it follows not only that 'validity' always refers to elements of knowledge and rationality such as arguments, inferences and propositions, but also that the appropriate frameworks to assess 'validity' are logics and scientific methodology. When the validity of a psychiatric diagnostic category is at stake, the contents to which it refers are those relevantly related to the notion of 'diagnostic concept'. The consequences of our reading on the notion of 'validity' are discussed vis-à-vis the challenges faced by psychiatric nosology in order to have its diagnostic categories validated.

Similar books and articles

Validity as a primitive.J. Ketland - 2012 - Analysis 72 (3):421-430.
Toward A Concept of Instrumental Validity: Implications for Psychiatric Diagnosis.Ronald Pies - 2011 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4 (1):18-19.
Reliability and Validity in Psychiatric Classification: Values and neo-Humeanism.Tim Thornton - 2002 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 9 (3):229-235.
On the concept of material consequence.Tomis Kapitan - 1982 - History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (2):193-211.
Knowledge of Validity.Sinan Dogramaci - 2010 - Noûs 44 (3):403-432.
Psychiatric diagnosis, psychiatric power and psychiatric abuse.T. Szasz - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):135-138.


Added to PP

386 (#52,339)

6 months
87 (#54,416)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Nature and main kinds of psychopathological mechanisms.Panagiotis Oulis - 2010 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 3 (2):27-34.
The Implications of Meaning for the Validity of Diagnostic Categories.David Trafimow - 2010 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 3 (1):23-24.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references