deconstruction and excision in philosophical posthumanism

Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):27 - 36 (2010)

Authors
David Roden
Open University (UK)
Abstract
I distinguish the ethics of transhumanism from a related metaphysical position which I refer to as “speculative posthumanism.” Speculative posthumanism holds that posthumans might be radically non-human and thus unintelligible in human terms. I claim that this transcendence can be viewed as analogous to that of the thing-in-itself in Kantian and post-Kantian European philosophy. This schema implies an impasse for transhumanism because, while the radically non-human or posthuman would elude evaluation according to transhumanist principles such as personal autonomy or liberal freedom, it is morally unacceptable for transhumanists to discount the possible outcomes of their favoured policies. I then consider whether the insights of critical posthumanists, who employ a cyborg perspective on human-technology couplings, can dissolve this impasse by “deconstructing” the opposition between the human and its prospective posthuman successors. By exhibiting its logical basis in the postructuralist philosophies of Derrida and Deleuze, I show that the cyborg perspective is consistent with both cyborg humanism and a modified speculative posthumanism. This modified account treats the alterity of the posthuman as a historically emergent feature of human and posthuman multiplicities that must be understood through their technical or imaginative synthesis, not in relation to a transcendental conception of the human.
Keywords Posthumanism  Transhumanism  Continental Philosophy  Metaphysics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,419
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Extended Mind.Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):7-19.
Limited Inc.Jacques Derrida - 1988 - Northwestern University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Спекулятивний постгуманізм: Натуралізація та віталізація.Nataliia V. Zahurska - 2018 - Вісник Харківського Національного Університету Імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Філософія. Філософські Перипетії» 59:25-31.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Posthumanism to Come.Christopher Peterson - 2011 - Angelaki 16 (2):127 - 141.
Posthumanism.Neil Badmington (ed.) - 2000 - Palgrave.
Posthuman Agency: Between Theoretical Traditions.Mark Peter Jones - 1996 - Sociological Theory 14 (3):290-309.
Posthumanism and Russian Religious Thought.Jan Krasicki - 2002 - Studies in East European Thought 54 (1-2):125-143.
Transhumanism, Metaphysics, and the Posthuman God.J. P. Bishop - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):700-720.
In Defense of Posthuman Dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Contradictions From the Enlightenment Roots of Transhumanism.J. Hughes - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):622-640.
Polanyi in the Face of Transhumanism.R. P. Doede - 2008 - Tradition and Discovery 35 (1):33-45.
What Is Posthumanism?Candice Salyers - 2011 - Environmental Philosophy 8 (1):134-137.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-01-09

Total views
85 ( #98,008 of 2,272,227 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #566,516 of 2,272,227 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature