deconstruction and excision in philosophical posthumanism

Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (1):27 - 36 (2010)
Abstract
I distinguish the ethics of transhumanism from a related metaphysical position which I refer to as “speculative posthumanism.” Speculative posthumanism holds that posthumans might be radically non-human and thus unintelligible in human terms. I claim that this transcendence can be viewed as analogous to that of the thing-in-itself in Kantian and post-Kantian European philosophy. This schema implies an impasse for transhumanism because, while the radically non-human or posthuman would elude evaluation according to transhumanist principles such as personal autonomy or liberal freedom, it is morally unacceptable for transhumanists to discount the possible outcomes of their favoured policies. I then consider whether the insights of critical posthumanists, who employ a cyborg perspective on human-technology couplings, can dissolve this impasse by “deconstructing” the opposition between the human and its prospective posthuman successors. By exhibiting its logical basis in the postructuralist philosophies of Derrida and Deleuze, I show that the cyborg perspective is consistent with both cyborg humanism and a modified speculative posthumanism. This modified account treats the alterity of the posthuman as a historically emergent feature of human and posthuman multiplicities that must be understood through their technical or imaginative synthesis, not in relation to a transcendental conception of the human.
Keywords Posthumanism  Transhumanism  Continental Philosophy  Metaphysics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Posthumanism to Come.Christopher Peterson - 2011 - Angelaki 16 (2):127 - 141.
Posthumanism.Neil Badmington (ed.) - 2000 - Palgrave.
Posthuman Agency: Between Theoretical Traditions.Mark Peter Jones - 1996 - Sociological Theory 14 (3):290-309.
Posthumanism and Russian Religious Thought.Jan Krasicki - 2002 - Studies in East European Thought 54 (1-2):125-143.
Transhumanism, Metaphysics, and the Posthuman God.J. P. Bishop - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):700-720.
In Defense of Posthuman Dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Contradictions From the Enlightenment Roots of Transhumanism.J. Hughes - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):622-640.
Polanyi in the Face of Transhumanism.R. P. Doede - 2008 - Tradition and Discovery 35 (1):33-45.
What Is Posthumanism?Candice Salyers - 2011 - Environmental Philosophy 8 (1):134-137.
Added to PP index
2012-01-09

Total downloads
70 ( #77,268 of 2,193,222 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #17,267 of 2,193,222 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature