Authors
Abstract
Universals have traditionally thought to obey the identity of indiscernibles, that is, it has traditionally been thought that there can be no perfectly similar universals. But at least in the conception of universals as immanent, there is nothing that rules out there being indiscernible universals. In this paper, I shall argue that there is useful work indiscernible universals can do, and so there might be reason to postulate indiscernible universals. In particular, I shall argue that postulating indiscernible universals can allow a theory of universals to identify particulars with bundles of universals, and that postulating indiscernible universals can allow a theory of universals to develop an account of the resemblance of quantitative universals that avoids the objections that Armstrong’s account faces. Finally, I shall respond to some objections and I shall undermine the criterion of distinction between particulars and universals that says that the distinction between particulars and universals lies in that while there can be indiscernible particulars, there cannot be indiscernible universals.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/0020174x.2016.1210541
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
From an Ontological Point of View.John Heil - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
A World of States of Affairs.D. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:429-440.
The Identity of Indiscernibles.Max Black - 1952 - Mind 61 (242):153-164.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The World Just Is the Way It Is.David Builes - 2021 - The Monist 104 (1):1-27.
Abstracta and Abstraction in Trope Theory.A. R. J. Fisher - 2020 - Philosophical Papers 49 (1):41-67.
Structural Universals.A. R. J. Fisher - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (10):e12518.
A New Universal Bundle Theory.Ruoyu Zhang - 2018 - Philosophia 46 (2):473-486.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology.Michael J. Loux (ed.) - 1970 - University of Notre Dame Press.
A Modal Bundle Theory.Jiri Benovsky - 2006 - Metaphysica 7 (2).
Are There Universals of Reading? We Don't Believe So.Max Coltheart & Stephen Crain - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):282-283.
"Bare Particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Three Trope Theories.Paweł Rojek - 2008 - Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
Russell on the Relations of Universals and Particulars.Larry Lee Blackman - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:265-278.
The Problem of Universals.Charles Landesman - 1971 - New York: Basic Books.
The Operator Theory of Instantiation.Peter Forrest - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):213 – 228.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-29

Total views
91 ( #128,137 of 2,506,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,897 of 2,506,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes