NATURE’S DARK DOMAIN: AN ARGUMENT FOR A NATURALIZED PHENOMENOLOGY

Abstract
Phenomenology is based on a doctrine of evidence that accords a crucial role to the human capacity to conceptualise or ‘intuit’ features of their experience. However, there are grounds for holding that some experiential entities to which phenomenologists are committed must be intuition-transcendent or ‘dark’. Examples of dark phenomenology include the very fine-grained perceptual discriminations which Thomas Metzinger calls ‘Raffman Qualia’ and, crucially, the structure of temporal awareness. It can be argued, on this basis, that phenomenology is in much the same epistemological relationship to its own subject matter as descriptive (i.e. ‘phenomenological’) physics or biology are to physical and biological reality: phenomenology cannot tell us what phenomenology is really ‘about’. This does not mean we should abjure phenomenology. It implies, rather, that the domain of phenomenology is not the province of a self-standing, autonomous discipline but must be investigated with any empirically fruitful techniques that are open to us (e.g. computational neuroscience, artificial intelligence, etc.). Finally, it entails that while a naturalized phenomenology should be retained as a descriptive, empirical method, it should not be accorded transcendental authority.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S135824611300009X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2005 - MIT Press.
What is It Like to Be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Critique of Pure Phenomenology.Alva Noë - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):231-245.
Kant and Phenomenology.Tom Rockmore - 2011 - University of Chicago Press.
Material Phenomenology.Michel Henry - 2008 - Fordham University Press.
The Place of Description in Phenomenology's Naturalization.Mark W. Brown - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (4):563-583.
Phenomenology.Govinda Chandra Dev & Saiyed Abdul Hai (eds.) - 1969 - [Dacca, Pakistan Philosophical Congress].
Phenomenology.Joel Smith - 2009 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Phenomenology and the Project of Naturalization.Dan Zahavi - 2004 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):331-47.
An Introduction to the Phenomenological Study of Sport.Irena Martínková & Jim Parry - 2011 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (3):185 - 201.
The Case Against Cognitive Phenomenology.Peter Carruthers & Bénédicte Veillet - 2011 - In Tim Bayne & Michelle Montague (eds.), Cognitive phenomenology. Oxford University Press. pp. 35.
What is Ecophenomenology?David Wood - 2001 - Research in Phenomenology 31 (1):78-95.
Perceptual Phenomenology.Bence Nanay - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):235-246.
Added to PP index
2012-01-09

Total downloads
144 ( #33,946 of 2,191,816 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #144,665 of 2,191,816 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature