Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):644 – 651 (2004)
Resemblance Nominalism is the view that denies universals and tropes and claims that what makes F-things F is their resemblances. A famous argument against Resemblance Nominalism is Russell's regress of resemblances, according to which the resemblance nominalist falls into a vicious infinite regress. Aristocratic Resemblance Nominalism, as opposed to Egalitarian Resemblance Nominalism, is the version of Resemblance Nominalism that claims that what makes F-things F is that they resemble the F-paradigms. In this paper I attempt to show that a recently advocated strategy to stop Russell's regress by using paradigms does not succeed.
|Keywords||Resemblance Nominalism Paradigms Resemblance regress|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Proof of the Existence of Universals—and Roman Ingarden's Ontology.Ingvar Johansson - 2009 - Metaphysica 10 (1):65-87.
Similar books and articles
Is the Partial Identity Account of Property Resemblance Logically Incoherent?Sophie Gibb - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (4):539-558.
Review of Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra's Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals. [REVIEW]D. M. Armstrong - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):285 – 286.
Resemblance Nominalism and Russell's Regress.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):395 – 408.
Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals.Gonzalo Rodríguez Pereyra - 2002 - Clarendon Press.
On Russell's Argument Against Resemblance Nominalism.James Cargile - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):549 – 560.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads131 ( #37,042 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #26,086 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?