Wilt Chamberlain Redux: Thinking Clearly about Externalities and the Promises of Justice

Reason Papers 39 (2):90-114 (2018)
Authors
Lamont Rodgers
Houston Community College System
Travis Joseph Rodgers
Valencia Community College
Abstract
Gordon Barnes accuses Robert Nozick and Eric Mack of neglecting, in two ways, the practical, empirical questions relevant to justice in the real world.1 He thinks these omissions show that the argument behind the Wilt Chamberlain example—which Nozick famously made in his seminal Anarchy, State, and Utopia—fails. As a result, he suggests that libertarians should concede that this argument fails. In this article, we show that Barnes’s key arguments hinge on misunderstandings of, or failures to notice, key aspects of the entitlement theory that undergirds Nozick’s and Mack’s work. Once the theory is properly understood, Barnes’s challenges fail to undermine the Chamberlain example, in particular, and the entitlement theory, in general.
Keywords nozick  entitlement theory  political theory  political legitimacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wilt Chamberlain Redux?Gordon Barnes - forthcoming - Philosophia:1-7.
Zur Kritik der Libertären Eigentumskonzeption.Peter Koller - 1981 - Analyse & Kritik 3 (2):137-154.
A Critique Of Robert Nozick's Critique Of Patterned Principles Of Justice.Haris Psarras - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 96 (2):239-249.
What Does Nozick's Minimal State Do?Gene E. Mumy - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):275.
What Does Nozick's Minimal State Do?: Gene E. Mumy.Gene E. Mumy - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (2):275-305.
6 The Entitlement Theory of Justice.Robert Nozick - forthcoming - Contemporary Political Theory: A Reader.
Political Authority and the Minimal State.Fabian Wendt - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (1):97-122.
Rawls. Vs. Nozick Vs. Kant on Domestic Economic Justice.Helga Varden - 2016 - In Kant and Social Policies. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 93-123.
Necessity and Nozick's Theory of Entitlement.Michael Davis - 1977 - Political Theory 5 (2):219-232.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-02-05

Total downloads
50 ( #127,490 of 2,285,815 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #40,694 of 2,285,815 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature