- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Testing psychological trivia
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (4):433-436 (1985)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.3758/bf03330207
My notes
Similar books and articles
Modern Advances in Genetic Testing: Ethical Challenges and Training Implications for Current and Future Psychologists.Leah S. Richmond-Rakerd - 2013 - Ethics and Behavior 23 (1):31-43.
On the testability of psychological generalizations (psychological testability).David K. Henderson - 1991 - Philosophy of Science (December) 586 (December):586-606.
Trivia Quiz Night.Maureen Blane-Brown - forthcoming - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology.
Robustness and integrative survival in significance testing: The world's contribution to rationality.J. D. Trout - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1):1-15.
Discipline, subjectivity and personality: an analysis of the manuals of four psychological tests.Maarten Derksen - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (1):25-47.
Psychological assessment and testing.K. Pawlik - 2000 - In Kurt Pawlik & Mark R. Rosenzweig (eds.), International Handbook of Psychology. Sage Publications. pp. 265--406.
Book review: Erik Parens and Adrienne Asch. Prenatal testing: A review of prenatal testing and disability rights, Washington, D.c.: Georgetown university press, 2000; and rayna Rapp. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. [REVIEW]Mary Briody Mahowald - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):216-221.
The golden rule in psychological testing: Please, please don’t do it unto me.Kurt F. Geisinger - 1988 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 8 (2):15-23.
Informed Consent in Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Outline of A Model between Specific and Generic Consent.Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):343-351.
Psychological research and Humean problems.Siri Naess & Arne Naess - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (2):134-146.
Testing as a selection tool: Another old and sticky managerial human rights issue. [REVIEW]George Munchus - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):817 - 820.
Ethics and genetics: Susceptibility testing in the workplace.Chris MacDonald & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):235-241.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-22
Downloads
12 (#813,154)
6 months
1 (#483,081)
2014-01-22
Downloads
12 (#813,154)
6 months
1 (#483,081)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5c86f9596c-kk9gx N