An Anselmian Approach to Divine Simplicity

Faith and Philosophy 37 (3):308-322 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The doctrine of divine simplicity (DDS) is an important aspect of the classical theism of philosophers like Augustine, Anselm, and Thomas Aquinas. Recently the doctrine has been defended in a Thomist mode using the intrinsic/extrinsic distinction. I argue that this approach entails problems which can be avoided by taking Anselm’s more Neoplatonic line. This does involve accepting some controversial claims: for example, that time is isotemporal and that God inevitably does the best. The most difficult problem involves trying to reconcile created libertarian free will with the Anselmian DDS. But for those attracted to DDS the Anselmian approach is worth considering.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselmian Eternalism.Katherin A. Rogers - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27.
Anselmian Eternalism.Katherin A. Rogers - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27.
Anselmian Theism.Yujin Nagasawa - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (8):564-571.
The Flexibility of Divine Simplicity.Mark K. Spencer - 2017 - International Philosophical Quarterly 57 (2):123-139.
Complexity without Composition.Jeff Steele & Thomas Williams - 2019 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (4):611-631.
Simply Impossible: A Case Against Divine Simplicity.R. T. Mullins - 2013 - Journal of Reformed Theology 7 (2):181-203.
Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom.W. Matthews Grant - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom.W. Matthews Grant - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.
Divine Simplicity.Thomas Schärtl - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):51-88.
Back to Eternalism.Katherin Rogers - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):320-338.
Is Divine Simplicity a Mistake?William Hasker - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):699-725.
Anselm on Free Choice and Character Formation.Thomas Williams - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (2):223-234.
Divine Simplicity and Divine Freedom.Brian Leftow - 2015 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 89:45-56.
Making Sense of Divine Simplicity.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):3-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-20

Downloads
58 (#265,779)

6 months
19 (#123,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katherin Rogers
University of Delaware

Citations of this work

Divine Simplicity and Modal Collapse: A Persistent Problem.Ryan Mullins & Shannon Byrd - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (1):21-52.
19 Divine Simplicity: Anselm’s Neoplatonic Approach.Katherin Rogers - 2024 - In Mirosław Szatkowski (ed.), Ontology of Divinity. De Gruyter. pp. 375-390.
17 Why Divine Simplicity Is Unnecessary.Stephen T. Davis - 2024 - In Mirosław Szatkowski (ed.), Ontology of Divinity. De Gruyter. pp. 347-356.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Time and Eternity.Brian Leftow - 2018 - Cornell University Press.
Intrinsic vs. extrinsic properties.Dan Marshall & Brian Weatherson - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Great Chain of Being.Arthur O. Lovejoy - 1936 - Science and Society 1 (2):252-256.
Divine Simplicity.William F. Vallicella - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 17 references / Add more references