Faith and Philosophy 28 (4):397-415 (2011)
Hugh McCann argues that God wills human sin, that humans are nonetheless significantly free, and that his position provides a satisfying theodicy of sin. I defend an Anselmian view: Although God causes the existence of all that exists, He does not produce sin. Human beings are the ultimate sources of their sinning, which sinning should not happen. McCann rejoins that my position is incoherent and that my criticisms are not well taken. I respond, clarifying Anselm’s understanding of human freedom, revisiting and defending my previous criticisms, and arguing that in practice McCann’s position is a poor fit for the Christian life
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
God is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann.Katherin A. Rogers - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Problem of Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom.William L. Rowe - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):98-101.
Anselmian Satisfaction, Duns Scotus and The Debt of Sin.Steven S. Aspenson - 1996 - Modern Schoolman 73 (2):141 - 158.
Anselm's Definition of Free Will.Stan R. Tyvoll - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):155-171.
Julian of Norwich: Problems of Evil and the Seriousness of Sin.Marilyn Adams - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):433-447.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads16 ( #292,446 of 2,152,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,782 of 2,152,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?