Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):3-27 (2007)
Anselm holds that God is timeless, time is tenseless, and humans have libertarian freedom. This combination of commitments is largely undefended incontemporary philosophy of religion. Here I explain Anselmian eternalism with its entailment of tenseless time, offer reasons for accepting it, and defend it against criticisms from William Hasker and other Open Theists. I argue that the tenseless view is coherent, that God’s eternal omniscience is consistent with libertarian freedom, that being eternal greatly enhances divine sovereignty, and that the Anselmian view supports the contention that the Bible is relevant today far better than does Open Theism
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
“The End of Immortality!” Eternal Life and the Makropulos Debate.Mikel Burley - 2015 - Journal of Ethics 19 (3-4):305-321.
Future Freedom and the Fixity of Truth: Closing the Road to Limited Foreknowledge Open Theism. [REVIEW]Benjamin H. Arbour - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):189-207.
Similar books and articles
God is Not the Author of Sin: An Anselmian Response to McCann.Katherin A. Rogers - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Incommensurability, Incomparability, and God's Choice of a World.Klaas J. Kraay - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):91 - 102.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #99,993 of 2,178,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #45,124 of 2,178,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?