Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):451-481 (2003)

Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the possibility of a new form of right that is both antidisciplinarian and liberated from ‘sovereignty’, the term Michel Foucault uses for what he claims to be the traditional theme of modern political philosophy. Some attempts to derive a theory of right from Foucault’s critique have been made. However, by their own admission they do not yield a coherent and adequate theory, and other work has demonstrated the major problems inherent in Foucault’s critique that render such a project problematic. This paper takes a different approach by revising the philosophical foundations of modern democracy with the goal of developing a new theory of right that addresses the problems that Foucault identified.To provide a theoretical context for this exploration, Foucault’s key concepts of disciplinary technologies, power, the construction and maintenance of human subjects, and the role of the human body in human subjection are briefly reviewed. The main analysis will focus on the ideas of three political theorists whose respective works represent the core of ‘sovereignty’, and who are indisputably basic to any student of Western political theory, namely Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. The aim of this analysis is not to provide another critique of their virtues and shortcomings. Instead, the work of these thinkers is used in a pragmatic way, to elicit a new form of right that could serve as a counter to disciplinary power.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453703294005
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,742
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Foucault, Rights and Freedom.Ben Golder - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):5-21.
Critique and Experience in Foucault.T. Lemke - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (4):26-48.
Rethinking Power and Law: Foucault’s Society Must Be Defended. [REVIEW]Jacques de Ville - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (2):211-226.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

After Foucault: A New Form of Right.Roger Mourad - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):451-481.
Foucault and Enlightenment: A Critical Reappraisal.Amy Allen - 2003 - Constellations 10 (2):180-198.
Foucault Among the Classicists, Again.Brendan Boyle - 2012 - Foucault Studies 13:138-156.
Foucault and the Contemporary Scene.Francois Ewald - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (3):81-91.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-23

Total views
11 ( #771,116 of 2,350,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,429 of 2,350,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes