Dialogue and Universalism 8 (11):143-154 (1998)

The aim of this study is to discuss in what sense one can speak about universal character of logic. The authors argue that the role of logic stands mainly in the generality of its language and its unrestricted applications to any field of knowledge and normal human life. The authors try to precise that universality of logic tends in: (a) general character of inference rules and the possibility of using those rules as a tool of justification of theorems of every science, (b) principles of correct formulating of thoughts and using language, and (c) general deductive method of reasoning, i.e in the study of language syntax and semantics. The authors present two theories of language syntax and semantics as exemplifications based on the Tarski’s famous results in metalogic: (1) a formalization of universal syntax system by Andrzej Grzegorczyk based on a new primitive notion of quotation-marks operator, and (2) an enlarged system of axiomatic theory of syntax of any categorial language of Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska’s in which the main role plays the relation of concatenation understood as a set-theoretical function. The study concludes in arguing that the importance of the result (2) lies not only in solving some philosophical problems but also in different fields of knowledge and spheres of human life as ex. in discussion and education as well.
Keywords universal logic,  semantic definition of truth  universal syntax theory,  logical analysis,  history of Logic  education
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/du1998811/1214
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Universal Logic `Universal'?Fu Tzu-Keng - 2016 - SOUTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LOGIC 2 (1):127-153.
Universal Logic as a General Theory of Logic.Musa Akrami - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations at University of Tabriz 6 (10):44-61.
Universal Logic: Evolution of a Project.Jean-Yves Beziau - 2018 - Logica Universalis 12 (1-2):1-8.
Hilbert's Axiomatics as ‘Symbolic Form’?Rossella Lupacchini - 2014 - Perspectives on Science 22 (1):1-34.
Logic and the Ontology of Language.Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska - 2020 - In Bartłomiej Skowron (ed.), Contemporary Polish Ontology. De Gruyter. pp. 109-132.
Universal Induction and True Universal Arithmetic.Teresa Bigorajska - 1994 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (1):103-105.
Algebraic Characterizations for Universal Fragments of Logic.Raimon Elgueta - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (3):385-398.
Logics and Their Galaxies.Hilan Bensusan, Alexandre Costa-Leite & Edélcio De De Souza - 2015 - In Arnold Koslow & Arthur Buchsbaum (eds.), The Road to Universal Logic. Birkhauser. pp. 243-252.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #722,269 of 2,419,781 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #52,830 of 2,419,781 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes