Libertarian Papers 2:36 (2010)

Authors
Tristan Rogers
California State University, Sacramento
Abstract
G.A. Cohen was perhaps libertarianism’s most formidable critic. In Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality he levels several strong criticisms against Robert Nozick’s theory put forth in Anarchy, State, and Utopia. In this paper, I counter several of Cohen’s criticisms. The debate operates at three stages: self-ownership, world-ownership, and initial acquisition. At the first stage, Cohen does not attempt to refute self-ownership, but weaken its force in providing moral grounds for capitalism. Here I argue that Cohen’s attempt to overturn Nozick’s slavery argument is unsuccessful because partial-slavery, while normatively different from full-slavery, is still normatively wrong. At the second stage, Cohen argues for a joint-ownership view of the world’s resources. In particular, he claims that self-ownership is rendered merely formal in a jointly-owned world and in a capitalist world. To rebut this challenge I show that even if Cohen is right about this, libertarian self-ownership is only formal in Cohen’s peculiar case where only two people exist and one owns everything. In contrast, self-ownership in a jointly-owned world is formal in all cases. Lastly, at the third stage, Cohen argues against Nozick’s interpretation of the Lockean proviso, claiming that it is impossible to satisfy. Granting Cohen’s argument here, I go on to defend Jan Narveson’s no-proviso view of acquisition from Cohen’s thus far unanswered criticism. I show that significantly, in his critique, Cohen equivocates between positive and negative rights. Taken jointly, my responses at these three stages ground the anti-egalitarian conclusion that, in Cohen’s words, ‘[e]xtensive inequality of condition is unavoidable, or avoidable only on pain of violating people’s rights to themselves and to things.’ The sequence, then, is from self-ownership, to world-ownership, via initial acquisition
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,261
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self‐ and World‐Ownership: Rejoinder to Epstein, Palmer, and Feallsanach.Justin Weinberg - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (3):325-336.
Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Autonomy.George G. Brenkert - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (1):27-55.
A Lockean Argument for Basic Income.Daniel Moseley - 2011 - Basic Income Studies 6 (2):11.
G. A. Cohen on Self‐Ownership, Property, and Equality.Tom G. Palmer - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (3):225-251.
Freedom, Self‐Ownership, and Libertarian Philosophical Diaspora.Justin Weinberg - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (3):323-344.
The Appeal of Self-Ownership.Brian Mcelwee - 2010 - Social Theory and Practice 36 (2):213-232.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-11-15

Total views
108 ( #101,092 of 2,455,787 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,201 of 2,455,787 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes