Authors
Guy Rohrbaugh
Auburn University
Abstract
When is an artwork complete? Most hold that the correct answer to this question is psychological in nature. A work is said to be complete just in case the artist regards it as complete or is appropriately disposed to act as if he or she did. Even though this view seems strongly supported by metaphysical, epistemological, and normative considerations, this article argues that such psychologism about completeness is mistaken, fundamentally, because it cannot make sense of the artist's own perspective on his or her work. For the artist, the question is not about his or her own psychology, but about the character of the work and the context in which he or she works. A nonpsychological account of completeness, on which completeness is a question of whether the work satisfies the conditions implicit in the artist's plan, avoids this problem and is equally or better able to explain the metaphysical, epistemic, and normative phenomena which appeared to support psychologism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jaac.12370
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,645
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
The Varieties of Reference.Louise M. Antony - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):275.
Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge.Richard Moran - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):448-454.
Spreading the world.Simon Blackburn - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 176 (3):385-387.
Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Return to Musical Idealism.Wesley D. Cray & Carl Matheson - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):702-715.
How to Understand the Completion of Art.Patrick Grafton‐Cardwell - 2020 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (2):197-208.
Psychologism About Artistic Plans: A Response to Rohrbaugh.Wesley D. Cray - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (1):101-104.
Psychologism About Artistic Plans: Reply to Cray.Guy Rohrbaugh - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (1):105-107.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Completeness: From Gödel to Henkin.Maria Manzano & Enrique Alonso - 2014 - History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (1):1-26.
Psychologism, Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error.Eric Wiland - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):68–78.
Presuppositional Completeness.Wojciech Buszkowski - 1989 - Studia Logica 48 (1):23 - 34.
The Complete Work.Kelly Trogdon & Paisley Nathan Livingston - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (3):225-233.
Husserl on Completeness, Definitely.Mirja Hartimo - 2018 - Synthese 195 (4):1509-1527.
Aspects of Psychologism.Tim Crane - 2014 - Harvard University Press.
The Many Senses of Completeness.Jairo da Silva - 2000 - Manuscrito 23 (2):41-60.
Was Wittgenstein Frege's Heir?Karen Green - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):289-308.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-27

Total views
27 ( #369,343 of 2,349,142 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #511,414 of 2,349,142 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes