Searle's Derivation of 'Ought' from 'Is'

Philosophical Studies 22:121-138 (1973)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0554-0739
DOI 10.5840/philstudies19732215
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,071
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Problems with Searle's Derivation?Edmund Wall - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):571-580.
A Note on John R. Searle's Derivation of 'Ought' From 'Is'.Harald Ofstad & Lars Bergström - 1965 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):309-314.
Conceptual and Derivation Systems.Jiří Raclavský & Petr Kuchyňka - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2):159-174.
Chinese Room Argument.Larry Hauser - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Searle on Metaphor.Jakub Mácha - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (supplementary issue no. 2):186-197.
Rationality in Action: A Symposium.John R. Searle, Barry Smith, Leo Zaibert & Josef Moural - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):66 – 94.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-02

Total downloads

9 ( #463,573 of 2,171,693 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #173,816 of 2,171,693 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums