Studies in East European Thought 71 (2):119-140 (2019)

Authors
Paweł Rojek
Jagiellonian University
Abstract
Semen Frank was one of the first and most ardent advocates of the ontological argument in the twentieth century. He proposed an original interpretation of the ontological argument based on its analogy to Descartes’ Cogito. Frank believed that it is possible to develop Cogito ergo sum into Cogito ergo est ens absolutum. In this paper, I analyze his version of the ontological argument. First, I propose a simple reconstruction of his reasoning, paying attention to its hidden premise. Second, departing from the classical logical interpretations of Descartes’ argument, I show that for Frank the claim that God exists had the same logical properties as Cogito. As a result, it seems that his argument was formally correct, though based on a premise which could hardly be convincing for a non-believer. This should not be surprising, however, since Frank, as most Russian religious philosophers, was not interested in the project of philosophical theology. His main concern was rather the development of philosophy based on religious premises, which might be called “theological philosophy”.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11212-019-09326-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,645
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
The Nature of Necessity.Kit Fine - 1976 - Philosophical Review 85 (4):562.
Cogito, Ergo Sum: Inference or Performance?Jaakko Hintikka - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (1):3-32.
Anselm and Actuality.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Noûs 4 (2):175-188.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ontologism in Semyon Frank.Teresa Obolevitch - forthcoming - Studies in East European Thought.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ontological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2008 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Blackwell.
Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Negative Theology and Science in the Thought of Semyon Frank.Teresa Obolevitch - 2010 - Studies in East European Thought 62 (1):93-99.
Descartes's 'Cogito'.Jerrold J. Katz - 1987 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (3/4):175-196.
Ontological Argument in Leibniz's Philosophy.Ali Tahiri - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 39.
Maydole on Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445.
Makin on the Ontological Argument.Graham Oppy - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (255):106 - 114.
The Ontological Argument.Brian Davies - 1988 - Cogito 2 (2):6-9.
L’interprétation performative du Cogito cartésien.Elena Dragalina Chernaya - 2013 - Cahiers de Philosophie de L’Université de Caen 50:121-139..
Ambulo Ergo Sum.Lucy O'Brien - 2015 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 76:57-75.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-26

Total views
12 ( #729,526 of 2,349,060 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,311 of 2,349,060 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes