The Journal of Ethics 3 (1):51-71 (1999)

Bernard Rollin
Colorado State University
The advent of cloning animals has created a maelstrom of social concern about the ethical issues associated with the possibility of cloning humans. When the ethical concerns are clearly examined, however, many of them turn out to be less matters of rational ethics than knee-jerk emotion, religious bias, or fear of that which is not understood. Three categories of real and spurious ethical concerns are presented and discussed: 1) that cloning is intrinsically wrong, 2) that cloning must lead to bad consequences, and 3) that cloning harms the organism generated. The need for a rational ethical framework for discussing biotechnological advances is presented and defended.
Keywords biotechnology  cloning  ethics of biotechnology  ethics of cloning  ethics of human cloning  ethics for reproductive technology  genetic engineering  human cloning  religious ethics  reproductive technology  secular ethics  social ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1009775715165
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
169 ( #65,195 of 2,463,162 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,391 of 2,463,162 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes