¿Hacia Galileo experimentos? (Did Galileo do experiments?)

Theoria 20 (1):5-23 (2005)

Abstract
Peter Dear ha proporcionado recientemente un análisis de la transformación que sufrió el recurso a la experiencia en la filosofía natural del siglo XVll. De la experiencia de lo cotidiano se pasa a la descripción detallada de una experiencia artificial irrepetible, localizada espacio-temporalmente y producida por instrumentos más o menos complejos. EI artículo explora dicha interpretación en referencia a la construcción de la ciencia del movimiento de Galileo, mediante un análisis dcl experimento del plano inclinado que se describe en los Discorsi y un manuscrito, y concluye que la interpretacion de Dear dificulta considerablemente la caracterización de la práctica de Galileo.Peter Dear has recently put forward an analysis of th transformation underwent by the appeal to experience in Seventeenth-Century natural philosophy. According to Dear, this transformation lies in the change from common experience to the detailed description of an unrepeatable artificial experience space temporally located and produced by more or less sophisticated instruments. This paper explores Dear’s interpretation with regard to the construction of Galileo’s science of motion, by analyzing the celebrated inclined plane experiment described in the Discorsi as well as one of Galileo's manuscripts and concludes that Dear’s interpretation makes very difficult the characterization of Galileo’s practice
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI theoria200520121
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,282
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Science of Mechanics. [REVIEW]Ernst Mach - 1903 - Ancient Philosophy (Misc) 13:317.
La Philosophie Naturelle de Galilée.Maurice Clavelin - 1970 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (1):124-125.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Galileo Vs Aristotle on Free Falling Bodies.Markus Andreas Schrenk - 2004 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 7 (1):1-11.
Patterns of Argumentation in Galileo's Discorsi.Marta Feh - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17 – 24.
Patterns of Argumentation in Galileo's Discorsi.Marta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17-24.
Galileo and the Philosophy of Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
Galileo, Rationality and Explanation.Joseph C. Pitt - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.
Aspects of Aristotelian Statics in Galileo's Dynamics.J. Groot - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
78 ( #112,117 of 2,285,919 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #833,345 of 2,285,919 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature