Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (1):90-111 (2018)
AbstractUntil fairly recently, positions within the global justice debate have been quite polarised along the statism/cosmopolitanism dichotomy. Recently, the dichotomy has been challenged, but the idea that the proximity of a view to cosmopolitanism also tracks its critical potential in political terms has not. This article rejects this premise. In order to do so, it also provides a novel, more systematic challenge to the statism/cosmopolitanism dichotomy. The main suggestion is that we should consider two aspects simultaneously, and identify positions within the debate on the basis of how they relate to both of these. First of all, participants in the debate can make three different kinds of claims, which I shall call moral, political, and institutional. Secondly, views position themselves within a spectrum in each of the three dimensions, rather than deciding between cosmopolitanism and statism – and at different at different points of the spectrum with regard to their moral, political, and institutional commitments respectively. This account gives us a better grasp of what taking a stand in the global justice entails. Crucially, it enables us to understand that the transformative and critical potential of a specific view depends on a variety of factors, and not only on its stand at the moral level. One can be fairly critical of the status quo without endorsing a cosmopolitan, or even nearly cosmopolitan, moral outlook. In short, the moral story is not the whole story.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Taking Back Control.Robert Jubb - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
The EU 's Role in Income Redistribution and Insurance: Support, Norm‐Setter or Provider? A Review of Justice‐Based Arguments.Frank Vandenbroucke - 2022 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):471-487.
Similar books and articles
Justice, Injustice, and Critical Potential Beyond Borders: A Multi‐Dimensional Affair.Miriam Ronzoni - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2).
Cosmopolitanism with Room for Nationalism.Win-Chiat Lee - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2):279-293.
Justice Without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism.Kok-Chor Tan - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Cosmopolitanism and Competition: Probing the Limits of Egalitarian Justice.David Wiens - 2017 - Economics and Philosophy 33 (1):91-124.
The Conflicting Loyalties of Statism and Globalism: Can Global Democracy Resolve the Liberal Conundrum?Deen Chatterjee - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (1):65-76.
Beyond Cosmopolitanism: Towards a Non-Ideal Account of Transnational Justice.Christine Chwaszcza - 2008 - Ethics and Global Politics 1 (3).
Justice and Morality Beyond Naïve Cosmopolitanism.Lea Ypi - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (3):171-192.
Cosmopolitan Justice and Minority Rights: The Case of Minority Nations.Ferran Requejo - 2012 - Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 3 (3):83.
Global Citizenship as the Completion of Cosmopolitanism.Luis Cabrera - 2008 - Journal of International Political Theory 4 (1):84-104.