Augustinianum 53 (2):531-545 (2013)

Through an analysis of the transmission and the historical context of the text, as well as of the doctrinal content of CPL 1610, this paper substantiates the likelihood of the Gelasian authorship of the letter, which was called into question by Coustant Thiel and Schwartz and supported by Nautin
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/agstm201353228
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nota sulla diffusione della filosofia di Spinoza in Italia.Emilia Giancotti Boscherini - 1963 - Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 42:339-362.


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #946,592 of 2,411,291 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,938 of 2,411,291 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes