Philosophia:1-16 (forthcoming)

Authors
David Rondel
University of Nevada, Reno
Abstract
Jason Brennan and Peter Jaworski argue in recent work that “semiotic” or “symbolic” objections to markets are unsuccessful. I counter-argue that there are indeed some semiotic limits on markets and that anti-commodification theorists are not merely expressing disgust when they disapprove of markets in certain goods on those grounds. One central argument is that, contrary to what Brennan and Jaworski claim, semiotic arguments against markets do not depend fundamentally on meanings that prevail about markets. Rather, they depend on the meanings that attach to various goods, meanings that give us moral bases on which to make judgments about their prospective commodification.
Keywords markets  commodification  Libertarianism  Consequentialism  Efficiency
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-021-00374-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.
Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality.G. A. Cohen - 1995 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Markets with Some Limits.Mark Wells - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (4):611-618.
Impure Semiotic Objections to Markets.David G. Dick - 2018 - Public Affairs Quarterly 32 (3):227-246.
Satz and Semiotics.James Stacey Taylor - 2019 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (2):243-257.
Can’T Buy Me Love.Jacob Sparks - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Research 42:341-352.
Semiotic Arguments and Markets in Votes.James Stacey Taylor - 2017 - Business Ethics Journal Review 5 (6):35-39.
The Meaning of a Market and the Meaning of "Meaning".Julian D. Jonker - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 15 (2).
What Limits Should Markets Be Without?James Stacey Taylor - 2016 - Business Ethics Journal Review 4 (7):41-46.
Democracy and the Epistemic Limits of Markets.Kevin J. Elliott - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (1):1-25.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-22

Total views
12 ( #781,254 of 2,445,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #56,817 of 2,445,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes