Two Concepts of the Basic Structure, and their Relevance to Global Justice

Abstract

G. A. Cohen argues that John Rawls’s focus on the basic structure of society as the exclusive subject of social justice is misguided. I argue that two understandings of the notion of basic structure seem to be present in the literature, either in implicit or in explicit terms. According to the first, the basic structure is to be equated with a given set of institutions: if they endorse the right principles of justice, the basic structure of society is just; According to the second, a society has a just basic structure if and only if its institutional web manages to realize the relevant principles of justice as well it can. In, the institutional structure is not a given: different social circumstances call for different institutional solutions in order to achieve a just basic structure overall. The first part of the paper make a case for, and explores some of its normative implications. The second part asks which consequences this understanding may have for the idea of a global basic structure.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-18

Downloads
18 (#614,186)

6 months
1 (#386,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.G. A. Cohen - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):3-30.
Basic Structure and the Value of Equality.A. J. Julius - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (4):321-355.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Republicanism and Global Institutions: Three Desiderata in Tension.Miriam Ronzoni - 2017 - Social Philosophy and Policy 34 (1):186-208.
What Makes a Basic Structure Just?Miriam Ronzoni - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):203-218.
Rawls and Racial Justice.D. C. Matthew - 2017 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16 (3):235-258.
Frontiers of Responsibility for Global Justice.Mathilde Unger & Juliette Roussin - 2018 - Journal of Social Philosophy 49 (3):381-392.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Makes a Basic Structure Just?Miriam Ronzoni - 2008 - Res Publica 14 (3):203-218.
Why the Basic Structure?Louis-Philippe Hodgson - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (3-4):303-334.
The Basic Structure as a System of Social Practices.C. M. Melenovsky - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (4):599-624.
Coercion, the Basic Structure, and the Family.Blain Neufeld - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):37-54.
Contract Law as Fairness.Josse Klijnsma - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (1):68-88.
How Egalitarian is Rawls's Theory of Justice?Ian Hunt - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (2):155-181.
Disaggregating Global Justice.Helena de Bres - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (3):422-448.
Comment on Andrew Walton.Carina Fourie - 2013 - Analyse & Kritik 35 (1):187-192.
The Implication of Rawls' Approach to Public Reason.Xin Liu - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (1):161-169.
The Division of Moral Labour and the Basic Structure Restriction.Thomas Porter - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (2):173-199.