Could a religious ethics ever be universal?

Bijdragen 65 (2):209-225 (2004)

Authors
Angela Roothaan
VU University Amsterdam
Abstract
In the correspondence between Baruch Spinoza and his former friends Nicolas Stensen and Albert Burgh we find an interesting discussion on the sense of committing oneself to a particular institutionalized religion. Burgh and Stensen, both being converts to Roman Catholicism, tried to convince the former Jew to make the same move as they did. Spinoza answers Burgh that he will not do so, and refers to his ‘universal religion’, which he developed in his published work, the Theological-Political Treatise. This modern religion should provide the grounds for a peaceful social and individual life. It is tolerant towards all kinds of personal views of God, while holding high a universal ethics, which should be acceptable to all good men. In this article this small correspondence is analyzed and clarified with reference to Spinoza’s works. Also the critical question will be asked whether Spinoza can convincingly maintain to have found a religion which is acceptable to all humankind. Rather, it is argued that his religion remains tied to the particular religious tradition from which it takes it’s ethical content. Finally, some valuable elements in Spinoza’s approach will be singled out
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2143/BIJ.65.2.504388
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,282
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Letters. Spinoza, Samuel Shirley, Steven Barbone, Lee Rice & Jacob Adler (eds.) - 1995 - Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
The Significance of Spinoza's First Kind of Knowledge.A. G. Wernham - 1968 - Philosophical Quarterly 18 (73):366-367.
Within Reason: A Life of Spinoza.Margaret Gullan-Whur - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (290):613-615.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison.Aaron Stalnaker - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
Is Natural Law a Border Concept Between Judaism and Christianity?David Novak - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):237-254.
Religious Ethics as a Field and Discipline.John P. Reeder Jr - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):32 - 53.
Universal Values, Behavioral Ethics and Entrepreneurship.Ruth Clarke & John Aram - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (5):561-572.
Peirce's Pragmatic Theology and Stoic Religious Ethics1.John R. Shook - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):344-363.
Toward a Universal Declaration of a Global Ethic.Leonard Swidler - 2004 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 3 (7):19-45.
A Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the World's Religions.Arvind Sharma - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3):539-539.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-15

Total views
9 ( #822,735 of 2,285,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #571,252 of 2,285,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature