E-mail and Eudaimonia: Global Justice and Moral Concern

South African Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):402-410 (2004)

Abstract

In his recent book, Happiness, Pedro Tabensky has argued for an Aristotelian account of happiness as eudaimonia or flourishing. However, his account of happiness appears to have the unfortunate implication that both individual eudaimonia and global justice are in principle unattainable. I examine Tabensky's reasons for believing that his account has such unfortunate implications, and suggest that, if appropriately modified, he would be able to avoid them. S. Afr. J. Philos. Vol.23(4) 2004: 402-410

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
14 (#738,020)

6 months
6 (#117,274)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

The Self-Justifying Desire for Happiness.Raffaele Rodogno - 2004 - South African Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):343-352.
Two Conceptions of Happiness.Richard Kraut - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (2):167-197.
Natural Capacities and Democracy as a Good-in-Itself.Josiah Ober - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (1):59 - 73.
Euthanasia and Eudaimonia.David Shaw - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (9):530-533.
Political Participation and Eudaimonia in Aristotle's Politics.T. Duvall - 1998 - History of Political Thought 19 (1):21-34.
Gillian Brock, Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account.Stan van Hooft - 2009 - Ethics and Global Politics 2 (4):369-382.

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations