Four Pillars of Internet Research Ethics with Web 2.0

Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (4):265-268 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The proliferation of social media and web 2.0 applications (Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, blogs, etc.) in the previous 5 years has created a new social research opportunity, with over an estimated 552 million active daily users on Facebook (Facebook Press 2012). As with all research, boundaries must be set out to create valid and accurate data, keeping ethical practices at the forefront of the data gathering process. The lack of standardized practices requires an in-depth look into the use of such methods, with focus on four major areas: 1) security for the individual, 2) anonymity, 3) safety and 4) use of mined data and information gathered by either passive or active means

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personal internet archives and ethics.Stine Lomborg - 2013 - Research Ethics 9 (1):20-31.
Is anonymity an artifact in ethnographic research?Will C. van den Hoonaard - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):141-151.
Trust and privacy in the future internet—a research perspective.Dirk van Rooy & Jacques Bus - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):397-404.
Informational privacy, data mining, and the internet.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.
What is special about the ethical issues in online research?Dag Elgesem - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3):195-203.
The use of secondary data in business ethics research.Christopher J. Cowton - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (4):423-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-14

Downloads
59 (#261,735)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?