The ethical status of non-commercial spam

Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):141-152 (2007)

Abstract

Much attention has been given in recent years to the moral status of commercial spam. Less attention has been focused on newer, non-commercial varieties of spam, such as spam from political parties, community sector organizations and governments. This article makes a start on evaluating the moral status of these non-commercial varieties of spam, drawing on arguments used to evaluate commercial spam.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#518,797)

6 months
1 (#386,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1956 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press. pp. 519-522.
An Introduction to Kant's Ethics.Roger J. Sullivan - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Am I?John L. Pollock - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):237-309.
Freedom of Expression in Commerce.Kenton F. Machina - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):375 - 406.
Ethical Reflections on the Problem of Spam.R. A. Spinello - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (3):185-191.