Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):20-39 (2001)

Authors
Michael Root
University of Minnesota
Abstract
The biomedical sciences employ race as a descriptive and analytic category. They use race to describe differences in rates of morbidity and mortality and to explain variations in drug sensitivity and metabolism. But there are problems with the use of race in medicine. This article identifies a number of the problems and assesses some solutions. The first three sections consider how race is defined and whether the racial data used in biomedical research are reliable and valid. The next three sections explain why racial variation in disease, including genetic disease, is not evidence that race is biological. The final section explains how a proper understanding of the role of race in medicine bears on public policy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/004839310103100102
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Sexual Harassment and Wrongful Communication.Edmund Wall - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (4):525-537.
The Spectre of Race in American Medicine.Mariam O. Fofana - 2013 - Medical Humanities 39 (2):137-141.
Tragic Error and Agent Responsibility.Charlotte Witt - 2005 - Philosophic Exchange 35 (1).

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
94 ( #106,004 of 2,410,446 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #86,626 of 2,410,446 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes