Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 5 (1) (2017)
Abstract |
This paper argues that, for Ockham, the parts of the continuum exist in act in the continuum: they are already there before any division of the continuum. Yet, they are infinitely many in that no division of the continuum will exhaust all the existing parts of the continuum taken conjointly. This reading of Ockham takes into account the crucial place of his new concept of the infinite in his analysis of the infinite divisibility of the continuum. Like many of his fellow anti-atomists, Ockham stresses that the concept of a potential infinite seems to contradict Aristotle’s modal logic, in particular the central assumption that there is no potency that will never be realized. Ockham, like other fourteenth-century anti-atomists, tried not only to refute atomism, but also to propose an analysis of the infinite divisibility of the continuum that is not incompatible with their modal logic.
|
Keywords | William of Ockham, anti-atomism, continuum, infinite divisibility, paradoxes of the infinite |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780198806035.003.0006 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Infinity and Continuity.John E. Murdoch - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 564--91.
Crathorn on Extension.Magali Elise Roques - 2016 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 83 (2):423-467.
Syncategoremata, Sophismata, Exponibilia.Norman Kretzmann - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 211--241.
Henry of Harclay on the Infinite.Richard C. Dales - 1984 - Journal of the History of Ideas 45 (2):295.
View all 10 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Atomism and Infinite Divisibility.Ralph Edward Kenyon - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
The Aristotelian Continuum. A Formal Characterization.Peter Roeper - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2):211-232.
Infinite Divisibility and Actual Parts in Hume’s Treatise.Thomas Holden - 2002 - Hume Studies 28 (1):3-25.
The Power-Set Theorem and the Continuum Hypothesis: A Dialogue Concerning Infinite Number.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2016 - Amazon Digital Services LLC.
A Dialogue on Zeno's Paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise.Dale Jacquette - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (3):273-290.
Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility.Robert Fogelin - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):47-69.
Achievements and Fallacies in Hume's Account of Infinite Divisibility.James Franklin - 1994 - Hume Studies 20 (1):85-101.
Peirce's Topical Continuum: A “Thicker” Theory.Jon Alan Schmidt - 2020 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 56 (1):62-80.
Counting Information: A Note on Physicalized Numbers. [REVIEW]Brian Rotman - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (2):229-238.
El infinito y el continuo en el sistema numérico.Eduardo Dib - 1995 - Dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto
Continuity: Three Accounts, and Their Relation to Zeno's Paradoxes.Susannah Ruth Labov - 1985 - Dissertation, Yale University
On Finitism and the Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Stephen Puryear.Andrew Ter Ern Loke - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (3):591-595.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-07-15
Total views
15 ( #700,660 of 2,518,135 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,135 )
2020-07-15
Total views
15 ( #700,660 of 2,518,135 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,135 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads