Abstract
This paper argues that, for Ockham, the parts of the continuum exist in act in the continuum: they are already there before any division of the continuum. Yet, they are infinitely many in that no division of the continuum will exhaust all the existing parts of the continuum taken conjointly. This reading of Ockham takes into account the crucial place of his new concept of the infinite in his analysis of the infinite divisibility of the continuum. Like many of his fellow anti-atomists, Ockham stresses that the concept of a potential infinite seems to contradict Aristotle’s modal logic, in particular the central assumption that there is no potency that will never be realized. Ockham, like other fourteenth-century anti-atomists, tried not only to refute atomism, but also to propose an analysis of the infinite divisibility of the continuum that is not incompatible with their modal logic.
Keywords William of Ockham, anti-atomism, continuum, infinite divisibility, paradoxes of the infinite
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1093/oso/9780198806035.003.0006
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Infinity and Continuity.John E. Murdoch - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 564--91.
Introduction.Frédéric Goubier & Magali Roques - 2017 - Vivarium 55 (1-3):1-8.
Crathorn on Extension.Magali Elise Roques - 2016 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 83 (2):423-467.
Syncategoremata, Sophismata, Exponibilia.Norman Kretzmann - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 211--241.
Henry of Harclay on the Infinite.Richard C. Dales - 1984 - Journal of the History of Ideas 45 (2):295.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Atomism and Infinite Divisibility.Ralph Edward Kenyon - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
The Aristotelian Continuum. A Formal Characterization.Peter Roeper - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2):211-232.
Locations.William J. Edgar - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):323 - 333.
Peirce's Topical Continuum: A “Thicker” Theory.Jon Alan Schmidt - 2020 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 56 (1):62-80.
El infinito y el continuo en el sistema numérico.Eduardo Dib - 1995 - Dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-15

Total views
15 ( #700,660 of 2,518,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes