Mind 116 (461):55-104 (2007)
Within certain philosophical debates, most notably those concerning the limits of our knowledge, agnosticism seems a plausible, and potentially the right, stance to take. Yet, in order to qualify as a proper stance, and not just the refusal to adopt any, agnosticism must be shown to be in opposition to both endorsement and denial and to be answerable to future evidence. This paper explicates and defends the thesis that agnosticism may indeed define such a third stance that is weaker than scepticism and hence offers a genuine alternative to realism and anti-realism about our cognitive limits.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Being in a Position to Know and Closure.Jan Heylen - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):63-67.
Being in a Position to Know and Closure: Reply to Heylen.Sven Rosenkranz - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):68-72.
Radical Scepticism Without Epistemic Closure.Sven Rosenkranz - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):692-718.
Similar books and articles
Moral Practice and Ultimate Reality.Harry Stopes‐Roe - 1983 - Journal of Moral Education 12 (2):81-91.
Dr. Abbot's "Way Out of Agnosticism":The "Way Out of Agnosticism; or, the Philosophy of Free Religion,". Francis Ellingwood Abbot.Josiah Royce - 1890 - Ethics 1 (1):98-.
Stance: Ideas About Emotion, Style, and Meaning for the Study of Expressive Culture.Harris M. Berger - 2009 - Wesleyan University Press.
Weak Agnosticism Defended.Graham Oppy - 1994 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (3):147 - 167.
Agnosticism About Other Worlds: A New Antirealist Programme in Modality.John Divers - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):660–685.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads112 ( #41,029 of 2,132,859 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #115,118 of 2,132,859 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.