Ideas Y Valores 61 (150):203-228 (2012)

Authors
Gabriela Rossi
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
Abstract
En el artículo se examinan los dos intentos de Aristóteles por explicar el fenómeno de las acciones voluntarias e involuntarias: Ética Eudemia (EE) II 6-9 y Ética Nicomaquea (EN) III 1. Entre ambos tratamientos hay muchas coincidencias, pero también diferencias sustantivas, tanto en la caracterización de las acciones involuntarias como en la estrategia argumentativa general y la definición de lo voluntario. El artículo procura dar cuenta de dichas diferencias de contenido en función de la estrategia metodológica general por la que opta Aristóteles en uno y otro caso. The article examines Aristotle's two attempts to explain the phenomena of voluntary and involuntary actions: Eudemian Ethics (EE) II 6-9 and Nicomachean Ethics (EN) III 1. Though there are notorious coincidences, there are also substantial differences between them in the characterization of involuntary actions, in the general argumentative strategy, and in the definition of voluntary actions. The paper endeavors to account for these material differences on the basis of the general methodological strategy used by Aristotle in each case
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,639
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics.Jonathan Barnes - 1980 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34 (3):490.
Aristotle and the Problems of Method in Ethics.Marco Zingano - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32:297-330.
Aristotle’s Ethical Theory.W. F. R. Hardie - 1968 - Oxford University Press.
Reason and Responsibility in Aristotle.Terence H. Irwin - 1980 - In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Essays on Aristotle's Ethics. University of California Press. pp. 117--155.
Aristotle.L. D. Dowdall, J. A. Smith & W. D. Ross - 1910 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 30 (8):386.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aquinas on Threats and Temptations.Paul Hoffman - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):225–242.
Involuntary Belief and the Command to Have Faith.Robert J. Hartman - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):181-192.
Tragic Error and Agent Responsibility.Charlotte Witt - 2005 - Philosophic Exchange 35 (1).
The Nicomachean Ethics.Lesley Brown (ed.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Aquinas on Non-Voluntary Acts.Jeffrey Hause - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):459-475.
Why Is Belief Involuntary?Jonathan Bennett - 1990 - Analysis 50 (2):87 - 107.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-05-24

Total views
28 ( #349,322 of 2,331,392 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #588,490 of 2,331,392 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes