Cultural and experiential differences in the development of folkbiological induction

Carey's book on conceptual change and the accompanying argument that children's biology initially is organized in terms of naïve psychology has sparked a great detail of research and debate. This body of research on children's biology has, however, been almost exclusively been based on urban, majority culture children in the US or in other industrialized nations. The development of folkbiological knowledge may depend on cultural and experiential background. If this is the case, then urban majority culture children may prove to be the exception rather than the rule, because plants and animals do not play a significant role in their everyday life. Urban majority culture children, rural majority culture children, and rural Native American children were given a property projection task based on Carey's original paradigm. Each group produced a unique profile of development. Only urban children showed evidence for early anthropocentrism, suggesting that the co-mingling of psychology and biology may be a product of an impoverished experience with nature. In comparison to urban majority culture children even the youngest rural children generalized in terms of biological affinity. In addition, all ages of Native American children and the older rural majority culture children gave clear evidence of ecological reasoning. These results show that both culture and expertise play a role in the development of folkbiological thought.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,934
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mechanisms of Theory Formation in Young Children.Alison Gopnik - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (8):371-377.
Vitalistic Causality in Young Children's Naive Biology.Kayoko Inagaki & Giyoo Hatano - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (8):356-362.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Psychological Development of Deaf Children.Marc Marschark - 1997 - Oxford University Press USA.
Children, School Choice and Social Differences.Diane Reay & Helen Lucey - 2000 - Educational Studies 26 (1):83-100.
Indo-Fijian Children's BMI.Dawn B. Neill - 2007 - Human Nature 18 (3):209-224.
Rural–Urban Migration; Educating the Children.H. Jin - forthcoming - Education and Culture.
Added to PP index

Total downloads

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
My notes
Sign in to use this feature