Philosophical Explorations 3 (3):244 – 261 (2000)
I discuss the role played by ordinary or everyday experience in the origin of philosophy. I begin with a discussion of the disappearance of production from the tripartite Aristotelian division of the arts and sciences, and indicate how production reappears as the assimilation of both theory and practice. If knowing is making, then there is no distinction between philosophy and poetry. In particular, the everyday or pre-theoretical world loses its status as the original source and subject-matter of philosophy It becomes an artifact, and in the age of science, an artifact of the "folk-world." The result is the deterioration of human nature, and science is deprived of its human significance. The first step back to clarity is to show that words like "reason" and "good," the core of moral competence, are identical at their root with phronesisor the rationality of common sense.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
New Insight Into Mencius' Theory of the Original Goodness in Human Nature.Zhang Pengwei, Guo Qiyong & Wang Bei - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):27 - 38.
Common-Sense and Scientific Psychology.Matthew Nudds - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):171-180.
Common-Sense Realism and the Unimaginable Otherness of Science.Bradley Monton - 2010 - Principia 11 (2):117-126.
Formal Ontology, Common Sense, and Cognitive Science.Barry Smith - 1995 - International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43:641–667.
Mental Attitudes and Common Sense Psychology: The Case Against Elimination.Radu J. Bogdan - 1988 - Noûs 22 (September):369-398.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #131,524 of 2,163,655 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,655 )
How can I increase my downloads?