Can the Law Do Without Retributivism? Comments on Erin Kelly’s The Limits of Blame

Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (2):217-222 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Erin Kelly’s The Limits of Blame presents a critique of our current overly-punitive legal system and champions a system of criminal justice that does not traffic in moral blame and is free of retributivist elements. This commentary questions the viability of such a system, and ultimately suggests that there is not much distance between a more perfect retributivist system and the kind of nuanced and humane system of criminal justice that Kelly envisions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,061

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Doing Without Desert.David Sussman - 2020 - Criminal Justice Ethics 39 (3):211-221.
Extending the Limits of Blame.D. Justin Coates - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (2):207-215.
Criminal Blame, Exclusion and Moral Dialogue.Costanza Porro - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (2):223-235.
The Limits of Blame: Rethinking Punishment and Responsibility.Erin Kelly - 2018 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
From Retributive to Restorative Justice.Erin I. Kelly - 2021 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (2):237-247.
Trials and Punishments.R. A. Duff - 1986 - Cambridge University Press.
Trials and Punishments.John Cottingham & R. A. Duff - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (149):448.
Rethinking Criminal Justice.Erin I. Kelly - 2020 - Res Philosophica 97 (2):169-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-07

Downloads
50 (#408,897)

6 months
9 (#388,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adina Roskies
Dartmouth College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references