Criminal Law and Philosophy 15 (2):217-222 (2021)
AbstractErin Kelly’s The Limits of Blame presents a critique of our current overly-punitive legal system and champions a system of criminal justice that does not traffic in moral blame and is free of retributivist elements. This commentary questions the viability of such a system, and ultimately suggests that there is not much distance between a more perfect retributivist system and the kind of nuanced and humane system of criminal justice that Kelly envisions.
Similar books and articles
The Limits of Blame: Rethinking Punishment and Responsibility.Erin Kelly - 2018 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
The Ethics of Law’s Authority: On Tommie Shelby's, Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform.Erin I. Kelly - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (1):1-12.
Character, blameworthiness, and blame: comments on George Sher’s In Praise of Blame.Angela M. Smith - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):31-39.
Mark D. White : Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy: Oxford University Press, New York, 2011, 272 pp. [REVIEW]Jules Holroyd - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):177-188.
Character and Blame in Hume and Beyond.Antti Kauppinen - 2016 - In Iskra Fileva (ed.), Questions of Character. Oxford University Press.
Desert of What? On Murphy’s Reluctant Retributivism.Linda Radzik - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):161-173.
The naturalist gap in ethics.Erin I. Kelly & Lionel K. McPherson - 2010 - In Mario de Caro & David Macarthur (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. Columbia University Press.
Justice and communitarian identity politics.Erin Kelly - 2001 - Journal of Value Inquiry 35 (1):71-93.
The burdens of collective liability.Erin Kelly - 2003 - In Dean Chatterjee & Donald Scheid (eds.), Ethics and Foreign Intervention. Cambridge University Press. pp. 118--39.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads