Explaining motivated desires

Topoi 21 (1-2):199-207 (2002)
I examine a dispute about the nature of practical reason, and in particular moral reason, generated by Thomas Nagel's proposal of an internalist rationalism which claims we can explain motivation in terms of reason and belief alone. In opposition, Humeans contend that such explanations must also appeal to further desires. Arguments on either side of this debate typically assume that a rationalist or Humean conclusion can be reached independently of a claim about the nature of moral judgment. I'll maintain, to the contrary, that a resolution of this dispute can only be achieved on the basis of such a claim.
Keywords Desire  Ethics  Motivation  Practical Reason  Hume  Smith, M
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1014821524051
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,213
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Belief Attribution and the Falsification of Motive Internalism.Michael Cholbi - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (5):607 – 616.
Sensibility Theory and Conservative Complancency.Peter W. Ross & Dale Turner - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):544–555.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

75 ( #68,112 of 2,154,182 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

16 ( #28,482 of 2,154,182 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums