University of Chicago Press (1992)

Authors
Alex Rosenberg
Duke University
Abstract
Economics today cannot predict the likely outcome of specific events any better than it could in the time of Adam Smith. This is Alexander Rosenberg's controversial challenge to the scientific status of economics. Rosenberg explains that the defining characteristic of any science is predictive improvability--the capacity to create more precise forecasts by evaluating the success of earlier predictions--and he forcefully argues that because economics has not been able to increase its predictive power for over two centuries, it is not a science.
Keywords Economics Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $1.49 used (96% off)   $26.40 new (25% off)   Amazon page
Call number HB72.R66 1992
ISBN(s) 0226727246   9780226727240   0226727238
DOI 10.1086/293639
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Economic Modelling as Robustness Analysis.Jaakko Kuorikoski, Aki Lehtinen & Caterina Marchionni - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (3):541-567.
Functionalism and the Role of Psychology in Economics.Christopher Clarke - 2020 - Journal of Economic Methodology 27 (4):292-310.

View all 75 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
126 ( #82,092 of 2,439,396 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #113,558 of 2,439,396 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes