Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):192-193 (2006)
Lea & Webley's (L&W's) non-exclusive distinction between tool-like and drug-like motivators is insufficiently discriminating to say much about money that is useful, as the distinction's equivocal application to sex, food, and drugs shows. Further, it appears as though the motivations of problem gamblers are non-metaphorically like those of drug addicts. (Published Online April 5 2006).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Money as Tool, Money as Resource: The Biology of Collecting Items for Their Own Sake.David A. Booth - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):180-181.
Money Motives, Moral Philosophy, and Biological Explanations.Adrian J. Walsh - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):195-196.
Tools, Drugs, and Signals in the Road From Evolution to Money.Federico Sanabria - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):193-194.
Hoarding Behavior: A Better Evolutionary Account of Money Psychology?Paul Bouissac - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):181-182.
Operant Contingencies and “Near-Money”.Simon Kemp & Randolph C. Grace - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):188-188.
Money as Tool, Money as Drug: The Biological Psychology of a Strong Incentive.Stephen E. G. Lea & Paul Webley - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):161-209.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #237,954 of 2,143,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,162 of 2,143,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.