Kantian Review 25 (2):243-265 (2020)

Abstract
An influential interpretation of Kant’s Doctrine of Right suggests that the relationship between public right and freedom is constitutive rather than instrumental. The focus has been on domestic right and members’ relations to their own state. This has resulted in a statist bias which has not adequately dealt with the fact that Kant regards public right as a system composed of three levels – domestic, international and cosmopolitan right. This article suggests that the constitutive relationship is between all levels of right, on the one hand, and ‘freedom in the external relation’ of all human beings, on the other hand.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1369415420000060
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophy and Real Politics.Raymond Geuss - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
Nations, States, and Territory.Anna Stilz - 2011 - Ethics 121 (3):572-601.
A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights.Lea Ypi - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):288-312.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

External Freedom in Kant’s Rechtslehre: Political, Metaphysical.Jennifer K. Uleman - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):578-601.
External Freedom in Kant’s Rechtslehre: Political, Metaphysical.Jennifer K. Uleman - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):578–601.
Kant's Definition of Enlightenment. Are We Really Free to Be Enlightened?Saniye Vatansever - 2018 - In Violetta Waibel, Margit Ruffing & David Edward Wagner (eds.), Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 2615-2622.
Radical Evil As A Regulative Idea.Markus Kohl - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (4):641-673.
Heidegger’s Interpretation of Freedom in Kant’s Philosophy.Mohammad Javad Safian & Marziyeh Piravi Vanak - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 11 (43-44):163-173.
Kant.Paul Guyer - 2006 - Routledge.
Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide.Lara Denis (ed.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant's Moral and Political Cosmopolitanism.Pauline Kleingeld - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (1):14-23.
Kant's Cosmopolitanism.Garrett Wallace Brown - 2010 - In Garrett Wallace Brown & David Held (eds.), The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Polity.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-01

Total views
5 ( #1,093,500 of 2,326,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #165,413 of 2,326,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes